The big word from the D.C. Circuit just out yesterday in Sierra Club v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 2017 WL 3597014 (D.C. Cir. 2017), is this: “downstream” emissions in pipeline approvals—the emissions that will or may occur as a result of the pipeline’s operation—cannot just be categorically excluded from Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) NEPA […]
Read moreThe National Flood Insurance Program: Time to Weigh Some Alternatives?
When the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) announced in 2012 that it was beginning a scoping process on a “programmatic” environmental impact statement (EIS) for the national flood insurance program, heads didn’t exactly bob up and down in nervous excitement. Indeed, that announcement seemed to coincide with a congressional probe and threats on Capitol Hill […]
Read moreWhen a President Rescinds a Memo
Among the provisions of President Trump’s executive order on climate change was this: Section 3(c) The Council on Environmental Quality shall rescind its final guidance entitled “Final Guidance for Federal for Federal Departments and Agencies on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Effects of Climate Change in National Environmental Policy Act Reviews . . […]
Read moreConference Announcement: NEPA in Transition
This “special institute” from the good folks at the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation is worth noting. Set for November 2-3, 2017, in Denver with a star-studded cast, it should be worth much more than the many CLE credits on offer! Cribbing from their announcement: With ongoing required federal permitting and approvals on energy and […]
Read moreA Guide that Doesn’t Guide?
The final Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) guidance on “the consideration of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change in [NEPA] reviews” was signed August 1. Although it omitted some of the more troubling points raised by the December 2014 draft (good), the document—styled as a memorandum to agency heads—is disappointingly passive on a vast and […]
Read moreBREAKING: CEQ Releases Final GHG Guidance
The final amended guidance can be found here. We will be posting a full analysis later this week. For now it suffices to point out that the amended final has dropped all mention of a 25,000 metric ton threshold for treating GHG emissions in NEPA documents. It has also shifted much of the guidance’s content […]
Read more*Good* News for Cape Wind? NEPA Compliance Comes in Steps
Cape Wind—America’s poster child for NIMBY litigation run amok—just emerged from a D.C. Circuit panel’s review with a telling result. Fast on the heels of a Ninth Circuit holding setting aside a proposed windfarm’s NEPA document for insufficient data, the D.C. Circuit announced on Tuesday that it was setting aside the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) […]
Read moreKXL the Keystone of US/Canada Relations No Longer
As has been widely reported, the KXL application will be denied. Our stories about KXL (like here) noted the challenges inherent in counting greenhouse gas emissions from something like the Alberta tar sands. In weighing a single infrastructure project (even an immense one) meant to speed development, it proved exceedingly hard to synthesize good accounting rules sorting out which emissions to […]
Read more